marijn 2017-01-16 03:06:49
krashan, segwit makes lightning possible, thats what i mean with it will reduce fees
Tootoot222 2017-01-16 03:08:27
the absence of transaction malleability makes lightning possible*
Tootoot222 2017-01-16 03:08:35
segwit is just one way of solving that particular problem
Lauda 2017-01-16 03:13:00
Yeah one of the many existing implementations that solve malleability.
Lauda 2017-01-16 03:13:01
/s
Tootoot222 2017-01-16 03:15:55
Lauda: talking about alternative software implementations of changes to the protocol is forbidden =)
Lauda 2017-01-16 03:16:08
Because they are done by high school kids.
Tootoot222 2017-01-16 03:16:41
that's not even a valid reason for any decision, in any context, ever
Lauda 2017-01-16 03:17:04
Yes, yes it is.
Tootoot222 2017-01-16 03:18:01
maybe that's why satoshi wished to remain anon, because if people found out he's just some highschooler with way too much free time to work on crypto projects, everybody would reject it
Lauda 2017-01-16 03:18:11
His code was horrible.
Tootoot222 2017-01-16 03:18:31
does that really matter?
Tootoot222 2017-01-16 03:18:37
it did its job
Lauda 2017-01-16 03:18:54
Had it not been properly patched up, there'd be no Bitcoin.
Lauda 2017-01-16 03:18:57
So the tl;dr is yes.
Trinity 2017-01-16 03:25:11
do I need port 8333 open in order to broadcast a transaction?
bitcoin190 2017-01-16 03:26:14
Hi
marijn 2017-01-16 03:27:14
Tootoot222, it's the cleanest way to fix it, other than adding opcodes
saracen 2017-01-16 03:40:58
gmaxwell: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7512
piqure 2017-01-16 03:40:59
^^^ WARNING: any URL may lead directly or indirectly to COIN-STEALING MALWARE! ^^^
saracen 2017-01-16 03:41:19
This has happened again. When I originally "took" these commits, I reported the problem to Github
saracen 2017-01-16 03:41:27
It was discussed here or in #bitcoin-dev
