abpa 2017-01-13 07:53:13
Why are there 10 OP NOP codes reserved for soft forks? Aren't there many more byte values available than just the 10?
instagibbs 2017-01-13 07:57:10
abpa, all the others were softforked out a long time ago
abpa 2017-01-13 07:58:35
instagibbs thanks, interesting
pizzadinner 2017-01-13 08:06:50
anyone on here?
poutine 2017-01-13 08:07:03
pizzadinner, Did you have a question other than polling people?
poutine 2017-01-13 08:07:42
I made a transaction that used all NOP codes
pizzadinner 2017-01-13 08:07:46
Just wanted to know the best way to get btc without faucets
abpa 2017-01-13 08:08:10
Including OP_NOP?
poutine 2017-01-13 08:08:13
https://blockchain.info/tx-index/63454893/0?show_adv=true
piqure 2017-01-13 08:08:14
^^^ WARNING: any URL may lead directly or indirectly to COIN-STEALING MALWARE! ^^^
poutine 2017-01-13 08:08:16
yup, all of them abpa
pizzadinner 2017-01-13 08:08:27
or if someone wanted to invest in me I could start day trading full time
arubi 2017-01-13 08:08:42
well actually op_nop is interesting
poutine 2017-01-13 08:08:48
pizzadinner, begging isn't on topic here, try #bitcoin-otc for ways to make bitcoin
pizzadinner 2017-01-13 08:08:58
not begging
poutine 2017-01-13 08:09:06
poutine 2017-01-13 08:09:08
that is begging
arubi 2017-01-13 08:09:08
should the rule be kept that "this does noting", or is soft-fork-able?
pizzadinner 2017-01-13 08:09:19
and do you think steem will ever take off?
arubi 2017-01-13 08:09:28
I think it should be kept as does nothing
abpa 2017-01-13 08:10:35
After SegWit maybe it doesn't matter
pizzadinner 2017-01-13 08:10:36
again not begging, offering full time work for btc & shared profits
poutine 2017-01-13 08:10:50
arubi, due to the fact these opcodes have been used, they likely have to do a "this does nothing until X" if implementing them
arubi 2017-01-13 08:10:51
abpa, yea, whole different system
abpa 2017-01-13 08:11:18
There's a trades channel #bitcoin-otc
arubi 2017-01-13 08:11:24
poutine, sure! op_nop1..op_nop16, but "op_nop" is something I think should be kept as actual nop
abpa 2017-01-13 08:11:35
Why did they skip NOP1?
poutine 2017-01-13 08:11:45
They did not skip it
poutine 2017-01-13 08:11:50
there's an OP_NOP1
abpa 2017-01-13 08:12:10
is there an OP_NOP2?
abpa 2017-01-13 08:12:18
Oh that's CLTV
poutine 2017-01-13 08:12:28
there's an OP_NOP, and then OP_NOP1 to OP_NOP10
abpa 2017-01-13 08:12:35
OP_NOP1 is still nothing right?
abpa 2017-01-13 08:12:37
OP_NOP3 is CSV
arubi 2017-01-13 08:13:09
op_nop1 isn't used yet
abpa 2017-01-13 08:13:29
Why is CLTV OP_NOP2 and not OP_NOP1?
arubi 2017-01-13 08:13:39
dunno
poutine 2017-01-13 08:13:57
OP_NOP1 was supposed to be https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0012
piqure 2017-01-13 08:13:59
^^^ WARNING: any URL may lead directly or indirectly to COIN-STEALING MALWARE! ^^^
arubi 2017-01-13 08:14:05
ah there you go
poutine 2017-01-13 08:14:19
OP_EVAL
abpa 2017-01-13 08:15:15
OK so instead they went with the magic pattern
arubi 2017-01-13 08:15:28
hehe can you imagine
abpa 2017-01-13 08:15:40
There was some recursion issue with EVAL right?
arubi 2017-01-13 08:16:10
not sure, never got to try it myself
learnode55 2017-01-13 08:40:42
http://ilredentore.dynv6.net/ ost-server...
piqure 2017-01-13 08:40:45
^^^ WARNING: any URL may lead directly or indirectly to COIN-STEALING MALWARE! ^^^
